Corpus delicti vs Canadian [Constituents of a Crime]
Current time: 05-20-2013, 11:17 PM
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Author: Guest
Last Post:
Replies: 0
Views: 897

Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Corpus delicti vs Canadian [Constituents of a Crime]
03-19-2008, 02:31 PM
Post: #4
Re: Corpus delicti vs Canadian [Constituents of a Crime]
This is a sneak-peek from the new book which will have a cross-reference to Canadian, English, Australian and New Zealand law:

“The violation of any legal right, committed knowingly, constitutes, prima facie, a “cause of action.””  Sleuter v. Scott, [1914], 6 W.W.R. 451.

“The word “action” according to the legal term, is a proceeding by which one party seeks in a court of justice to enforce some right against, or to restrain the commission of some wrong by, another party.  It includes both civil and criminal proceedings.”  Dorosh v. Bentwood Chair & Table Co., [1939] 2 W.W.R. 150; 47 Man.R. 133 (C.A.).  (emphasis mine)

It all centers on the violation of a legal right.  I like how the Canadian psychopaths admitted it includes criminal proceedings. 

If government services were valuable and the market wanted them, they wouldn't be provided on a compulsory basis.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Corpus delicti vs Canadian [Constituents of a Crime] - Dynamo Joe - 10-18-2007, 11:34 AM
Re: Corpus delicti vs Canadian [Constituents of a Crime] - Marc Stevens - 03-19-2008 02:31 PM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)