There is no "We."
Current time: 10-23-2017, 10:49 PM
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Author: NonEntity
Last Post: eye2i2hear
Replies: 27
Views: 3146

Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
There is no "We."
04-22-2017, 05:16 AM
Post: #16
RE: There is no "We."
There is no "We.'re" simply following your example, aye?

There is no "all."? There is no "their."? Stare

Be the change you wish to see.?

Word

Skeptical
Coupla things i've found me, myeself, and i-i-I (that "we.") have found circling around the olde noggin', are...

What precisely was intended or desired in using the phrase "panties in a wad"...? Does it's usage mean that the one using it find its usage personally insulting? Provoking? Provocative? [fill in how many blanks]? Is it like for gearheadm&mity, using (one of his favs) "your mother"? And "your parents basement" (etc)? Was it a mere "poke"? You know [sic], friendly? Or narcissistic and nastity? Says who? "We."? Ditto, "narcissist"? But with the latter, further asking, if it's a counter-assault (tip'o'the ole hat to gearheaduphisassmm)?????!!!!!!!!!
(and speaking "of", wasn't ole gearheaduphisa$$ also referred to as a "troll"?)
Gosh, if only "We.d" had it as panties in a wad!!!!!! !!!!!!!!! !!!!!!
(sorry, but i just can't nudge my narcissistity self to put it in ALL CAPS!!!2oo /snarcisscasm)


Here's the day the techies develop a mouse and touchpad sensor that automatically & accurately/honestly¹ appends an emotion indicator to each sentence expression We. lob toss plant post... Facepalm ?

For all the narcissistic types who have their panties all in a wad, Tantrum ? :nastymean: ? :genuineinsult: ? :genuinepoke: ?

Eyebrow Raise ¿ Acid

Surrender
NonSubstantive,

--countercontroll2i (and the speedE whorse he road inn own)
__________________________
1. haha, a mouse/touchpad Lie Detector... wouldn't the gumbits luv having that to hack 2oo!?

Is it voluntary? (because if it isn't, what inherently is it?)
And can it be voluntary, if there's indoctrination, intimidation, coercion, threats & initiation of violence?
[not to be confused with asking: can it be said to be "voluntary" even when such is present.?]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-22-2017, 05:47 AM
Post: #17
RE: There is no "We."
Hey Habby,
I just stumbled across this Corbett Report interview with Larken Rose that I think you may find of interest:



- NonE the severely deluded Sister Sleazious .).

"I just don't understand how this happens." Undecided
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-22-2017, 07:22 AM
Post: #18
RE: There is no "We."
(04-22-2017 05:47 AM)NonEntity Wrote:  Hey Habby,
I just stumbled across this Corbett Report interview with Larken Rose that I think you may find of interest:



Yes. It was / is interesting.

So what's your point?

Why'd you bring it to my attention specifically?

You think I should be using soft gloves when handling Galt?
You think my communication with Galt is too violent / aggressive?
You think Galt is his actual name, and he'll be put on the spot and embarrassed?

You sometimes bring up good points, but (erases everything before but) you are sometimes a XXX

As eye keeps pointing out, practice what you preach.

Can anybody delegate an authority they don't have?
Was anybody born with innate authority over anybody else?
Then how did authority nobody had get delegated to those who call themselves government?

Show me my personally signed contract wherein I consented to be governed.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-22-2017, 07:29 AM (This post was last modified: 04-22-2017 07:30 AM by NonEntity.)
Post: #19
RE: There is no "We."
(04-22-2017 07:22 AM)Habenae Est Dominatus Wrote:  
(04-22-2017 05:47 AM)NonEntity Wrote:  Hey Habby,
I just stumbled across this Corbett Report interview with Larken Rose that I think you may find of interest:

So what's your point?

See above.

- NonE the severely deluded Sister Sleazious .).

"I just don't understand how this happens." Undecided
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-22-2017, 08:34 AM
Post: #20
RE: There is no "We."
"See above."

How "substantive.". ?

Is it voluntary? (because if it isn't, what inherently is it?)
And can it be voluntary, if there's indoctrination, intimidation, coercion, threats & initiation of violence?
[not to be confused with asking: can it be said to be "voluntary" even when such is present.?]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-22-2017, 09:41 AM
Post: #21
RE: There is no "We."
(04-22-2017 07:29 AM)NonEntity Wrote:  
(04-22-2017 07:22 AM)Habenae Est Dominatus Wrote:  
(04-22-2017 05:47 AM)NonEntity Wrote:  Hey Habby,
I just stumbled across this Corbett Report interview with Larken Rose that I think you may find of interest:

So what's your point?

See above.

(05-08-2013 03:02 PM)NonEntity Wrote:  Nice Habbie! You've made good use of your lessons from Brucie in how to be cryptic and piss off your reader even before they see your argument! Tounge

By the way, after I was pissed off that you expected me to jump through your link hoops without giving me ANY god damned CLUE why I might want to do so...

(11-26-2015 09:28 AM)NonEntity Wrote:  Does the expression "fuck you and the horse you rode in on" clearly convey my respect for your position?

Can anybody delegate an authority they don't have?
Was anybody born with innate authority over anybody else?
Then how did authority nobody had get delegated to those who call themselves government?

Show me my personally signed contract wherein I consented to be governed.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-22-2017, 09:54 AM (This post was last modified: 04-22-2017 09:59 AM by NonEntity.)
Post: #22
RE: There is no "We."
Corbett Report interview with Larken Rose that I think you may find of interest.

Quote:Yes. It was / is interesting.

Mission accomplished. You're welcome. Smelling Flowers

- NonE the severely deluded Sister Sleazious .).

"I just don't understand how this happens." Undecided
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-23-2017, 04:18 AM (This post was last modified: 04-23-2017 04:24 AM by Andy.)
Post: #23
RE: There is no "We."
(04-21-2017 10:52 AM)NonEntity Wrote:  what I wrote above was not about Habby

That's why you not only gave attribute to Habby who authored the 5 questions, you took the time and effort to show evidence via the link to the exact comment where Habby posted them. As though to say: see, follow the link, here's my proof that Habby wrote them.

You emphasized the substance that you claim you didn't want readers to focus on. Evidence is substance. The tactic used is not benign as you'd have readers believe. Your recent comment -- partial quote above -- shows to me "nefarious" intent. I suspect that in your mind your cognitive dissonance (yeah, that's the "ticket"/spin; I just don't know how this happens) doesn't allow you to see how it is you and not the reader who is at fault.

If it wasn't your intent to take a jab at Habby, I see no other reason to include his 5 questions attributed to him with evidence to prove he wrote them. It was in not necessary for the conveyance/communication of what you authored in your OP.

Here's the quote I would have used, which was in the comment section of the same article that Habby's 5 questions were posted to... (Full disclosure, I posted the following quote to the comment section.)
Quote:“Citizenship is membership in a political society, and implies a duty of allegiance on the part of the member and a duty of protection on the part of the society. These are reciprocal obligations, one being a compensation for the other.” Luria v, U.S., 231 U.S. 9, 22. (1913)

My thanks to Habby for assisting in exposing Juan Galt's evasion of, would he take on a lawyer client that sues the government for it's failure to protect an individual. If you want to find a source for that quote you can click on the Habby link that Sister Sleazious included in the OP. That's right, the same comment from where he retrieved the 5 Habby quotes also has the Luria quote.

I've been doing this since I was five years old. Seriously, I, thankfully as it turns out, did it to my self by not seeking external authority for an answer to an important question. Some would say I'm a born skeptic. No, I've just had to learn how to better live with a choice I made several decades ago. It may be more accurate to say I'm a natural skeptic.

My mind is a poster child for "question everything".

--&e

What’s the difference between the government and the mafia?
The mafia doesn’t have a twelve year indoctrination system to convince you it’s not organized crime. ~ Brett Veinotte
Government public "education"/indoctrination is child abuse.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-20-2017, 06:33 AM
Post: #24
RE: There is no "We."
Quote:

- NonE the severely deluded Sister Sleazious .).

"I just don't understand how this happens." Undecided
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-20-2017, 01:18 PM
Post: #25
RE: There is no "We."
Something Carrol King might have sung...

We, my husband and I, wanted to make a baby. So that's what we did; we made a baby. I couldn't do it without him and his sperm. He couldn't do it without me and my eggs. We are a family of three -- our lineage a family tree -- without we -- not one of us would be.

"There is no we". Try explaining that to our baby girl. Though, you may have to wait till she's matured enough to understand what you're saying. Don't be shocked when she chuckles at your hubris.

--&e

What’s the difference between the government and the mafia?
The mafia doesn’t have a twelve year indoctrination system to convince you it’s not organized crime. ~ Brett Veinotte
Government public "education"/indoctrination is child abuse.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
08-10-2017, 07:02 PM
Post: #26
RE: There is no "We."
Confirming my thesis is this article from which I quote:
Brandon Smith Wrote:Without productive and inventive individuals striving to improve a structure, the structure will eventually stagnate or implode. Without individuals to support it, the system is nothing; it does not exist.
(emphasis mine)

- NonE the severely deluded Sister Sleazious .).

"I just don't understand how this happens." Undecided
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
08-10-2017, 10:01 PM
Post: #27
RE: There is no "We."
(08-10-2017 07:02 PM)NonEntity Wrote:  Confirming my thesis is this article from which I quote:
Brandon Smith Wrote:Without productive and inventive individuals striving to improve a structure, the structure will eventually stagnate or implode. Without individuals to support it, the system is nothing; it does not exist.
(emphasis mine)

What interests about this article is the fact that ALL government is socialist. The only difference is the degree.

Purveyor of the 60 MPH post.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
08-11-2017, 03:36 AM (This post was last modified: 08-11-2017 03:44 AM by eye2i2hear.)
Post: #28
RE: There is no "We."
(08-10-2017 07:02 PM)NonEntity Wrote:  Confirming my thesis is this article from which I quote:
Brandon Smith Wrote:Without productive and inventive individuals striving to improve a structure, the structure will eventually stagnate or implode. Without individuals to support it, the system is nothing; it does not exist.
(emphasis mine)

How is the rub with this not the "if" as logic inference circa Confused by way of "without"?

If there are ...individuals [doing], then how is there no (that) "we"? --Socrateaze

Meanwhile, fwiw, i find i missed in the OP what i know now see as "the context", thus an essential of an OP claim (there is no "we'). Thus, how are both mine and Andy's post points not out of context? Blush

While having a tingle along the lines of it instead having been something like "Is there a 'We"?" to "How is there a "we"?", i find it context-specified enough to consider reasonable. granted, in a more evolved day, arguably a Declaration for provocation's sake, i might value2?

Tho the sound of one hand clapping, and someone yammering on about not making Declarations, jog me back to, well, why make State-meants when questions can better get (thereisno)Us there? (better by way of 2 or more eyes on conflict prevention?)

Is there a "we"/what about those "we"s? (the latter being those in voluntary agreements "supporting" viz actions, no?)

Is the key here that "There is no "Ruler"? Confused (if one wishes to come across as a Ruler, aye, thus making State-meants/Declarations)

"How is there a 'Ruler' to Declare=State who is and isn't a 'We'?"
(Is there a "Ruler" IF there is an "inventive" "We" aka those individuals supporting it?)

[Image: wpid-article-1326193466653-0f6318cc00000...66x625.jpg]

Is it voluntary? (because if it isn't, what inherently is it?)
And can it be voluntary, if there's indoctrination, intimidation, coercion, threats & initiation of violence?
[not to be confused with asking: can it be said to be "voluntary" even when such is present.?]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)