Juan Galt banned
Current time: 11-21-2017, 12:51 AM
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Author: Marc Stevens
Last Post: Freerangecanuck
Replies: 96
Views: 6599

Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Juan Galt banned
09-07-2017, 10:21 AM
Post: #91
RE: Juan Galt banned
(09-07-2017 07:43 AM)Freerangecanuck Wrote:  The census is bad enough for me. How I have not been taken down for tossing that in the garbage surprises me.

(09-07-2017 08:09 AM)NonEntity Wrote:  We'll I think the census thing is about where you are on one very specific day. So one option I've used is just to be somewhere else on that day.. Go visit your mother-in-law or something.

I ignored the 2010 questionnaire mailing. They came to my operational nexus. (You have heard it called a "home" by others.)

"Three."

That's the answer to the question you are allowed to ask by the constitution.

That was my experience with the 2010 inquisition head count.

I'm lookin' forward to the 2020 inquisition head count.

I'll answer your questions just as soon as you submit verifiable evidence the constitution applies to me.

Can anybody delegate an authority they don't have?
Was anybody born with innate authority over anybody else?
Then how did authority nobody had get delegated to those who call themselves government?

Show me my personally signed contract wherein I consented to be governed.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-07-2017, 11:02 AM (This post was last modified: 09-07-2017 11:03 AM by NonEntity.)
Post: #92
RE: Juan Galt banned
(09-07-2017 10:21 AM)Habenae Est Dominatus Wrote:  "Three."

That's the answer to the question you are allowed to ask by the constitution.

The constitution allows me to ask questions? Very cool. I was not aware that I must seek permission before making inquiries with others, but it's nice to know I have permission.

Three. Is that the number of pimple hairs you have, or the number of pulls before your hedge regime fires up?

- NonE the severely deluded Sister Sleazious .).

"I just don't understand how this happens." Undecided
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-07-2017, 01:51 PM
Post: #93
RE: Juan Galt banned
(09-07-2017 11:02 AM)NonEntity Wrote:  
(09-07-2017 10:21 AM)Habenae Est Dominatus Wrote:  "Three."

That's the answer to the question you are allowed to ask by the constitution.

The constitution allows me to ask questions? Very cool. I was not aware that I must seek permission before making inquiries with others, but it's nice to know I have permission.

Three. Is that the number of pimple hairs you have, or the number of pulls before your hedge regime fires up?

Thank you for asking, NonE, That allows me reason to add more info.

The gubmint employees visited before I fully grokked Spooner's NO TREASON.

They wanted a bunch of demographic info, Which I refused to give them.

"Three." That's how many peoples live here.

This says what I was thinking back then:
Quote:A Refusal To Answer the Questions Notice to the Census Bureau
Posted on June 8, 2010 by censusthis

Here is a letter you may choose to include with your census form if you are choosing to return the form unanswered or with only the headcount question answered. click on the link at the bottom of this page to get the letter in PDF form.

To whom it may concern:

Pursuant to Article 1, section 2, clause 3 of the constitution, the only information you are empowered to request is the total number of occupants at this address.

My “name, sex, age, date of birth, race, ethnicity, telephone number, relationship and housing tenure” has absolutely nothing to do with apportioning direct taxes or determining the number of representatives in the House of Representatives.

Therefore, neither Congress nor the Census Bureau has the constitutional authority to make that information request a component of the enumeration outlined in Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3.

In addition, I cannot be subject to a fine for basing my conduct on the Constitution because that document trumps laws passed by Congress.

Therefore, neither Congress nor the Census Bureau has the constitutional authority to make that information request a component of the enumeration outlined in Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3.

In addition, I cannot be subject to a fine for basing my conduct on the Constitution because that document trumps laws passed by Congress.

Quote:Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brimson, 154 U.S. 447,479 (26 May 1894):

“Neither branch of the legislative department [House of Reps. or Senate], still less any merely administrative body [such as the Census Bureau ] , established by congress, possesses, or can be invested with, a general power of making inquiry into the private affairs of a citizen.”
Quote:Kilbourn v. Thompson ,103 U.S. 168,190. We said in Boyd v. U.S. , 116 U.S. 616,630 6 Sup. Ct. 524:

“…and it cannot be too often repeated; that the principles that embody the essence of constitutional liberty and security forbid all invasions on the part of the government and it employees of the sanctity of a man’s home and the privacies of his life.”
Quote:As stated by Mr. Justice Field IN RE Pacific Ry. commission, 32 FED. 241,250:

“…of all the rights of the citizen, few are of greater importance or more essential to his peace and happiness than the right of personal security, and that involves, not merely protection of his person from assault , but exemption of his private affairs, books, and papers from inspection and scrutiny of others. Without the enjoyment of this right, all others would lose half their value…”

Quote:Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.

Quote:13 U.S. Code § 221 - Refusal or neglect to answer questions; false answers

(a) Whoever, being over eighteen years of age, refuses or willfully neglects, when requested by the Secretary, or by any other authorized officer or employee of the Department of Commerce or bureau or agency thereof acting under the instructions of the Secretary or authorized officer, to answer, to the best of his knowledge, any of the questions on any schedule submitted to him in connection with any census or survey provided for by subchapters I, II, IV, and V of chapter 5 of this title, applying to himself or to the family to which he belongs or is related, or to the farm or farms of which he or his family is the occupant, shall be fined not more than $100.
(b) Whoever, when answering questions described in subsection (a) of this section, and under the conditions or circumstances described in such subsection, willfully gives any answer that is false, shall be fined not more than $500.
© Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, no person shall be compelled to disclose information relative to his religious beliefs or to membership in a religious body.

Poke
FREE CLUE:
CONTEXT: Census: the official process of counting the number of people in a country, city, or town
ANSWER: Three.
Poke

Can anybody delegate an authority they don't have?
Was anybody born with innate authority over anybody else?
Then how did authority nobody had get delegated to those who call themselves government?

Show me my personally signed contract wherein I consented to be governed.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-07-2017, 03:39 PM
Post: #94
RE: Juan Galt banned
(09-07-2017 01:51 PM)Habenae Est Dominatus Wrote:  Poke
FREE CLUE:
CONTEXT: Census: the official process of counting the number of people in a country, city, or town
ANSWER: Three.
Poke

Okay, so three people live in your country. 1) You, 2) Mrs. Habby, 3) Juan?

Besides, even an idiot knows the answer is 42.

- NonE the severely deluded Sister Sleazious .).

"I just don't understand how this happens." Undecided
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-07-2017, 05:29 PM
Post: #95
RE: Juan Galt banned
(09-07-2017 03:39 PM)NonEntity Wrote:  Besides, even an idiot knows the answer is 42.

Surrender

Can anybody delegate an authority they don't have?
Was anybody born with innate authority over anybody else?
Then how did authority nobody had get delegated to those who call themselves government?

Show me my personally signed contract wherein I consented to be governed.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-07-2017, 07:29 PM
Post: #96
Question RE: Juan Galt banned


[Image: Answer_to_Life.png]

- NonE the severely deluded Sister Sleazious .).

"I just don't understand how this happens." Undecided
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
09-07-2017, 09:52 PM (This post was last modified: 09-07-2017 09:56 PM by Freerangecanuck.)
Post: #97
RE: Juan Galt banned
The census asks the answer to the meaning of life?

In my best Johnny Carson - "I did not know that." LOL

Then, why would I? Immediately filed it in G.

Purveyor of the 60 MPH post.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)